A controlled consultancy methodology
Titan Verdict is built around an original six-dimension consultancy framework. Each supported game remains conditional unless its source route, relevant terms and approval status are documented in Titan's source register and approved through its governance process. Lawful access alone does not create a right to reproduce or commercially reuse source material. Titan records its own role assessments and strategic judgement; it does not reproduce, publish or commercialise the source material.
What the TVMaximus Engine does
The TVMaximus Engine is Titan Verdict's deterministic comparison calculator. It parses the plain-text army lists you provide, identifies supported units and applies consistent structural values. The same valid input, engine version and mission produce the same result.
Unrecognised units and list coverage
An identifier that cannot be reliably recognised is returned only as an unknown identifier, without submitted points or a guessed role. It contributes zero to all six metrics and is excluded from recommendations. Titan Verdict withholds a verdict when too little of either list is recognised and displays an incomplete-coverage warning when appropriate.
No simulation, dice rolling or AI interpretation
No battle simulation happens and no dice are rolled. No AI process or interpretation is used to discern any comparison, calculation, score or verdict. Classification lookup, six-metric aggregation and mission weighting are deterministic Titan-owned code: they make no model call, use no AI SDK and send no comparison calculation to a third-party model API. The same valid input, catalogue version and mission produce the same result.
Six metrics, one outcome
TVMaximus calculates Board Control, Durability, Ranged Threat, Melee Pressure, Mobility and Utility. The selected mission applies a different weighting to those six metrics, producing each army's overall score and the structural verdict. These are Titan Verdict planning dimensions, not official game characteristics or a guaranteed prediction.
What it does not know
The live beta is not a battle simulator or complete rules engine and does not maintain or reproduce full official datasheets. It rolls no dice and does not calculate weapon attacks, saving throws, stratagems, detachment interactions, conditional abilities, terrain states, deployment choices, player decisions, balance updates or live mission states.
What Titan explicitly avoids
Titan does not scan or OCR-process codices, rulebooks, datasheets or event packs.
Titan does not upload codex pages, rules text or other official publications to an AI provider, or use that material to train or evaluate an AI model.
Titan does not store complete verbatim abilities, closely reconstruct rules through paraphrase or build a searchable copy of every rule.
Titan does not display reconstructed datasheets or return complete unit characteristics and weapon profiles.
Titan does not scrape authorised apps, bypass access controls or import unauthorised community rules databases.
Titan does not use third-party publisher artwork, icons, trade dress or publication layouts.
Titan is not designed to let a customer avoid owning or lawfully accessing the official rules needed to play.
What Titan records instead
Titan records its own derived consultancy judgements, such as a unit's likely role, relative strengths, vulnerabilities and contribution to Board Control, Durability, Ranged Threat, Melee Pressure, Mobility and Utility. These original classifications are conclusions drawn from human review and Titan's methodology, not a substitute copy of the underlying publication.
Where the input comes from
The core input is list text supplied by the player, including exports from compatible army-building tools. Submit only a roster you created, obtained from an authorised source or are otherwise permitted to process. Buying or lawfully accessing a rulebook, codex or event pack does not by itself grant permission to reproduce protected text, so do not paste complete rules publications or unauthorised rules databases.
Rules, names and original analysis
Game titles, faction names and unit names may appear when they are present in user-supplied lists or are needed to identify the subject of the comparison. Titan's role labels, dimension scores and recommendations are independently authored analytical conclusions, not official rules wording or a close reconstruction of it. For exact wording, legality, points and interactions, use the relevant publisher's official publications and your event organiser.
How player feedback evolves TVMaximus
When players choose to send feedback, Titan Verdict uses the rating, issue category and comments they provide to identify parser failures, review role detection and test whether metric weightings produce useful results. Approved changes are reviewed before release into future versions of the TVMaximus Engine. Feedback does not automatically retrain the engine, alter a completed verdict or guarantee future outcomes.
How to read a verdict
Treat the score as a comparison prompt, not a win prediction. Parser warnings, unmatched points or missing roster sections reduce confidence in the result. A structurally strong list can still lose because the matchup, mission, terrain, rules interactions and player decisions belong to the game rather than the pasted list.
Corrections and questions
If a list is parsed incorrectly or a verdict appears weak, send the original export format and a description of the issue to support@titanverdict.com. Do not send copied rulebooks or unauthorised rules databases.